Interview as a technique of gathering information: strategy of concerns

Posted on: July 11th, 2018 by admin

Interview as a technique of gathering information: strategy of concerns

It is crucial to differentiate interviews as a technique of collecting information and interviewing being a genre. In the 1st instance, interview, that is, communication with individuals, is regarded as 3 ways to acquire information by a researcher. Two alternative methods are:

  • observation, once the researcher himself is an eyewitness for the event,
  • working together with documents, where in actuality the document means any material carrier texts that are containing images.

Forms of interviews and their purpose

Interviews as an approach of data gathering in turn are split into:

  • genre (for preparation of text within the genre of interview),
  • investigative (for information),
  • reportage (to determine the faculties of an individual, then to reflect them into the text).

The reportage interview was discussed when you look at the past chapter. In regards to the investigative shall find out when you look at the chapter on information retrieval. The theme for this chapter is meeting being a genre, being a real way of text formatting in the shape of questions from a interviewer additionally the answers associated with the interlocutor. In the same time there is an interview-monologue at one pole, in which the wide range of concerns associated with the researcher is minimized (they generally are no after all), in the other pole – a conversation, as soon as the journalist not merely asks concerns, but additionally talks much with long arguments.

The truth that the interview is a discussion, indicates concerning the same level of replicas of the journalist and interlocutor. Within the typical meeting, the interviewer answers take 70-90% regarding the text. A conversation could be conducted by way of a journalist, by authority comparable to the interlocutor, so your opinion of this journalist has also been interesting to visitors, due to the fact opinion associated with the interlocutor. This is a sign of insufficient qualification if an ordinary journalist speaks as much or more in an interview as an interlocutor.

Types of interviews with regards to the subject. Subject interview

According to the subject, you will find three types of interviews:

  • subject,
  • individual,
  • subject-personal.

Subject of the interview that is subject their state of things in virtually any industry of task. Usually it is a job interview with a professional, a genre of logical publicism. The interlocutor is interesting towards the journalist just as much as he could be linked to this situation. For example, a police officer informs how exactly to protect an apartment from thieves. The physician describes how exactly to protect your self from the flu epidemic. The monetary advisor makes a forecast the length of time the crisis would be in the trade. Neither the interlocutor’s viewpoint on conditions that deviate through the meeting topic, nor the personal life of the interlocutor is of interest.

The dwelling for the subject interview consists of three parts. First, they reveal the interlocutor’s experience of this issue. Then there was a parsing associated with topic for the purpose of its presentation, clarification and assessment. The topic interview ends because of the streamlining of that which was stated, summarizing, practical recommendations to visitors.

The hero for the topic interview can additionally be an eyewitness or participant in the case. This is certainly information interview, one of several news genres. The job of this journalist is to learn whenever you can the information and details of what happened. The interlocutor’s communication with the topic is first shown, then the topic is deepened, and the ending is devoted to general impressions of what happened and the conclusions that the interlocutor made as in the case of an expert.

Comments are closed.

© Copyright 2013 All rights reserved!